<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Web Design Company Melbourne &#187; Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alliancesoftware.com.au/blog/category/technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alliancesoftware.com.au/blog</link>
	<description>Web Design Company Melbourne</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 23:14:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>How Google Killed the Yellow Pages (Sorry Sensis)&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancesoftware.com.au/blog/technology/how-google-killed-the-yellow-pages-sorry-sensis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancesoftware.com.au/blog/technology/how-google-killed-the-yellow-pages-sorry-sensis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 02:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancesoftware.com.au/blog/?p=72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yellow pages may care to disagree with that statement but Google have taken away the need for services like Yellow Pages, especially in the physical form but also in the on-line world.
More and more people turn to the web to find instant solutions to their problems and in its basic form, as a search engine, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="intro">Yellow pages may care to disagree with that statement but Google have taken away the need for services like Yellow Pages, especially in the physical form but also in the on-line world.</p>
<p>More and more people turn to the web to find instant solutions to their problems and in its basic form, as a search engine, Google has hit directory businesses hard. To rub salt into their wounds they have also taken over the typical directory function by giving web users <a href="http://www.google.com/local/add/analyticsSplashPage?gl=us&amp;hl=en-US">Google Places</a>.</p>
<h2>The future is Google Places</h2>
<p>Google Places, which was <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/04/introducing-google-places.html">formally Google Local Business Centre</a>, enables business owners to provide location details, opening hours, photos, coupons, web site links and logo to name a few. Customers can also add reviews and the business owner can promote things like special events. It is clear to see that paper directories can not compete with this type of exposure. Couple all this with Google maps and customers can see exactly where you are and what your business looks like.</p>
<p>Yellow Pages are fully aware that they are no longer relevant, even the strategic communications manager at Sensis, who owns Yellow Pages, said that Yellow Pages is really for:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&ldquo;small businesses who may be time-poor and don&#8217;t always have the necessary expertise in marketing and advertising&rdquo;.</p>
<p><cite>Stephen Ronchi &mdash; Sensis</cite></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Pretty clear that they are trying to pitch to businesses that are not that technically aware. Google makes this so easy that that is no longer a barrier.</p>
<p>Smarter directory operators, including the likes of a client of ours dLook.com.au realised long ago that their service is effectively to create mini websites for clients that rely less on their traffic inside the site and more on pulling traffic from Google and to their customers. Indeed, it is the self service or low cost service of dLook and others in the market that make them competitive. </p>
<p>Interestingly Google pulls information from third parties, including Yellow Pages to create a basic profile. They want your input though and any information you give to Google will replace data from third parties.</p>
<p>The best bit is that Google Places is free. You can pay to get a featured ad but the free option puts you far and beyond what you would get from a traditional directory, in print or on-line.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/local/add/lookup?welcome=false&amp;hl=en-US&amp;gl=US">Registering your business</a> with Google Places is a few simple steps but it is best to compile all your business information for your profile before hand. If you need help with registering your business, we can easily provide that service.</p>
<p><span id="more-72"></span><br />
<h2>Google Analytics</h2>
<p>There is one thing that I haven&#8217;t mentioned yet and I think this is a big deal. Google Places also gives you stats! If you use Google Analytics then you will understand how much of a leap this is for the simple business directory. Having stats enables you to see exactly what people are doing, what they are clicking on and what they searched for. Admittedly these stats are not very full featured but they enable you to refine your business listing around the keywords that people are searching on.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.alliancesoftware.com.au/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/stats.png" alt="Google Places Stats" title="Google Places Stats" width="530" height="175" /></p>
<p>If you offer wireless internet at your caf&eacute; and see that people are searching for &#8220;Internet Caf&eacute; Wireless&#8221; and viewing your profile but not converting then you know you need to add that information to your listing. You could also create a coupon, give specials and target specific groups.</p>
<p>Google also seem to be expanding the analytics feature as some countries allow you to see where people are searching from, how many are coming from those regions and allow you to define service areas, great for small businesses.</p>
<p>Gone are the days of a small ad in a directory, this is a fully featured, interactive profile that customers can rate and comment on and that you, as the business owner, can at any time change and refine.</p>
<h2>Getting the Best from Google Places</h2>
<p>This is all quite new from Google so it makes sense that they want to be able to promote this service with fully complete business profiles. It appears that Google is giving preference to businesses that complete their profiles so it is in your best interest to give as much information about your business as possible.</p>
<p>Encouraging your customers to provide reviews also enables you to get the best exposure. This is two fold because people find more value in reviews that are relevant to them and because Google will want to put forward richer profiles.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.alliancesoftware.com.au/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/reviews.png" alt="Google Places Reviews" title="Google Places Reviews" width="530" height="280"  /></p>
<p>At the moment business listings are found through maps.google.com or locally through local.google.com. A smaller result can show up in the main Google search results. In these cases the phone number and contact details are prominant, along with a small amount of descriptive information. Listings in the main Google search engine are triggered by location keywords. For instance the term &#8220;Alliance Software&#8221; would not show our business listing but &#8220;Alliance Software Melbourne&#8221; would. With each listing you can click the link More information and it takes you through to your full profile.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.alliancesoftware.com.au/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/alliance-software-directory-result.png" alt="Alliance Software Search Result" title="Alliance Software Search Result" width="530" height="288" /></p>
<p>Again, <a href="http://www.google.com/local/add/lookup?welcome=false&amp;hl=en-US&amp;gl=US">registering</a> is easy. Give it a go.</p>
<h2>Help and Information</h2>
<p>It is important that you do not try and add information where it is not supposed to be. If in doubt, Google has the answer. You can read the <a href="http://www.google.com/support/places/bin/answer.py?hl=en&amp;answer=107528">Google Places quality guidelines</a> to ensure that you will get your business listed. They are clear in what they allow and what they won&#8217;t. There is also a comprehensive help section in the <a href="http://www.google.com/support/places/bin/static.py?page=guide.cs&amp;guide=28247&amp;topic=28292">Google Places User Guide</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancesoftware.com.au/blog/technology/how-google-killed-the-yellow-pages-sorry-sensis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interesting Comparison Of Web Browser Usage</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancesoftware.com.au/blog/technology/interesting-comparison-of-web-browser-usage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancesoftware.com.au/blog/technology/interesting-comparison-of-web-browser-usage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 04:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Stickland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancesoftware.com.au/blog/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
W3schools.com recently released a fun visualization, showing what browser software people are using &#8211; including historical web browser usage over time. It&#8217;s a fascinating one page snapshot and you can find it here:
http://www.axiis.org/examples/BrowserMarketShare.html
Top 5 Browsers by Market Share:
1. Firefox (47.40%)
2. Internet Explorer 7.0 (15.10%)
3. Internet Explorer 6.0 (13.60%)
4. Internet Explorer 8.0 (10.60%)
5. Google Chrome (7.0%)
Combined, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.alliancesoftware.com.au/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/blog-chart.jpg" alt="Web Browser Comparison Chart" title="blog-chart" width="530" height="125" class="size-full wp-image-64" /></p>
<h2>W3schools.com recently released a fun visualization, showing what browser software people are using &#8211; including historical web browser usage over time. It&#8217;s a fascinating one page snapshot and you can find it here:</h2>
<p><a title="Web Browser Statistics" href="http://www.axiis.org/examples/BrowserMarketShare.html">http://www.axiis.org/examples/BrowserMarketShare.html</a></p>
<p>Top 5 Browsers by Market Share:</p>
<p>1. Firefox (47.40%)<br />
2. Internet Explorer 7.0 (15.10%)<br />
3. Internet Explorer 6.0 (13.60%)<br />
4. Internet Explorer 8.0 (10.60%)<br />
5. Google Chrome (7.0%)</p>
<p>Combined, Internet Explorer 6.0, 7.0 and 8.0 account for 39.3% of market share.</p>
<p>(Source: W3schools.com&#8217;s Historical Browser Statistics, August 2009)</p>
<p>Web designers will rejoice at the shrinking size of Internet Explorer users &#8211; with Internet Explorer 6.0 in particular steadily shrinking from 24.0% to 13.6% between August 2008 and 2009.</p>
<p>The reason this is significant is because Internet Explorer 6.0 creates some tricky technical problems for web designers. This is due to the fact that Internet Explorer 6.0 does not display certain types of formatting (CSS) in a way that is consistent with other browsers &#8211; so designers need to dig into their bag of programming tricks to make sure websites look, and work, the same in Internet Explorer 6.0 as they do for other browsers.</p>
<p>Big movers-and-shakers of recent months have included Internet Explorer 8.0 &#8211; growing from launch to 10.8% market share within 8 months; and Google&#8217;s &#8220;Chrome&#8221; browser &#8211; which now accounts for 7% of the browser software market.</p>
<p><em>Does your web developer understand the differences between the way sites are displayed in some types of browsers? Alliance Software&#8217;s web developers do. <a title="Contact Alliance Software" href="http://www.alliancesoftware.com.au/contact">Click here to talk to us about your web-site</a></em><em>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancesoftware.com.au/blog/technology/interesting-comparison-of-web-browser-usage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Automated Website Testing &#8211; A Complete Site Wide Test in Minutes</title>
		<link>http://www.alliancesoftware.com.au/blog/technology/automated-website-testing-a-complete-site-wide-test-in-minutes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alliancesoftware.com.au/blog/technology/automated-website-testing-a-complete-site-wide-test-in-minutes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 03:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Stickland</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alliancesoftware.com.au/blog/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was recently told that todays advanced software systems represent the single most complex artifact or 'thing' that mankind has created.<br /><br />
Whilst this isn't true for all systems, it's certainly the case that even moderaly complex systems soon contain more details than one programmer can hold in their mind.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-full wp-image-18" title="blog-testing" src="http://www.alliancesoftware.com.au/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/blog-testing.jpg" alt="Automated Website Testing" width="530" height="125" /></p>
<h2>I was recently told that todays advanced software systems represent the single most complex artifact or &#8216;thing&#8217; that mankind has created.</h2>
<p>Whilst this isn&#8217;t true for all systems, it&#8217;s certainly the case that even moderaly complex systems soon contain more details than one programmer can hold in their mind. This gets worse for mature systems in a maintainence phase, where the developer isn&#8217;t regularly working to update the application.</p>
<p><span id="more-4"></span>This &#8216;I can&#8217;t remember the details of everything&#8217; problem leads to lots of documentation (if your disciplined) and to an inevitable client frustration where new defects are introduced into a system whilst work it&#8217;s being worked on. This problem is well documented in software engineering literature and appears indemic to the entire software industry (indeed it&#8217;s the frequency of introduced bugs people count, their existence is assumed). We certainly don&#8217;t claim to be immune. That&#8217;s why I&#8217;m excited by the results that our staff (thanks Liam, Terry, David, Liz &amp; Co) have been getting using the Selenium testing framework.</p>
<p>Selenium allows developers to create automated (client side) unit tests for standard website functionality. For example, a series of Selenium tests could be written to automatically check that the system functions correctly when ordering an item, conducting a search, updating user details etc. Once the tests are in place, they can be run in a few moments at any time as required.</p>
<p>Click here to see an impromptu video we took of Selenium tests on an application we&#8217;re building at present.</p>
<h3>Automated Website Testing Benefits</h3>
<p>Some of the benefits we&#8217;ve found using automated testing are:</p>
<ol>
<li>Detect more bugs during development &#8211; the process of writing tests caused us to find defects in what we deemed otherwise &#8216;perfect&#8217; code.</li>
<li>Confidence in refactoring &#8211; if for whatever reason, existing code must be modified / refactored, this can be done with far greater confidence.</li>
<li>Confidence for additions &#8211; experienced developers will know it&#8217;s not uncommon for changes in one module or function of a system to have unintended effects elsewhere. Whilst system wide human based system testing isn&#8217;t practical, system wide unit based testing is straight forward.</li>
<li>Better team programming &#8211; each of the above factors becomes even more important in team development projects.</li>
</ol>
<h3>Automated Website Testing Costs</h3>
<p>The obvious cost is time (which soon equates to money). In our first major deployment of Selenium Tests, we estimate an overhead of 20%. With that said, this project is currently part way through UAT (user acceptance testing) and the defect feedback rate has been incredibly low, so clearly the return should be quick enough.</p>
<p>For more about the Selenium framework, <a href="#">click here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alliancesoftware.com.au/blog/technology/automated-website-testing-a-complete-site-wide-test-in-minutes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

